Adidas

Photo: Timothy Herbert/OxfamAUS

So what’s the problem with adidas?

Thousands of workers endure poverty wages and harsh sweatshop-like conditions to make adidas their coveted sports shoes.

Adidas also don't have a good track record in relation to upholding trade union rights.

We have been in constant correspondence with adidas since 2006 asking that they uphold the rights of their workers.

So what’s the solution?

Better wages

Workers require a living wage, which is one that allows them to meet the basic needs of a family after working a full-time working week without overtime. Adidas won’t commit to a living wage for its workers.

But it will commit to paying already high earning sport stars millions of dollars to endorse their products.

The right to form trade unions

Adidas gets much of its gear made in countries and free trade zones where it is illegal or extremely difficult for workers to organise into unions. Without this united structure it is near impossible for individual workers to ask for improved conditions without fear of retribution.

Adidas has taken a positive step by signing onto the new Freedom of Association Protocol in Indonesia. Adidas was an active participant in negotiations with Indonesian unions and supplier factories to develop the Freedom of Association Protocol. The Protocol, which Adidas signed onto in June 2011, is already having positive impacts in a number of supplier factories. But Adidas must work hard to ensure that the Protocol is implemented at the factory level throughout its supply chain.

A confidential complaints structure

When workers suffer sexual harassment, intimidation, violence or other human rights violations they need to be able to access a confidential complaints mechanism, and they need those complaints to be taken seriously and handled sensitively. In response to public pressure, adidas has made some effort to establish complaint mechanisms in some factories, but most adidas workers don’t have access to a complaint mechanism which they have reason to trust.

Ban short-term contracts

Adidas moves its production where it likes when it likes and does not ban or discourage short-term contracts for its workers. So when it leaves an area those workers on short-term contracts are left with nothing.

Incentives for respecting workers’ rights

Adidas should offer meaningful incentives to factories that respect workers’ rights, particularly workers’ right to organise trade unions. Without genuine incentives human rights abuses will continue.

Dear adidas,

… large sporting goods manufacturers have the responsibility to minimise large discrepancies of wage and working condition between the developed and developing worlds. I find it abhorrent that sports people are awarded millions in sponsorship deals while factory workers for the same company are paid around four euros a day. I hope you can take these criticisms from myself and others seriously.

This message was sent by campaign supporter Frances Ampt in 2006, in response to an appeal from Oxfam Australia for supporters to send protest emails to sports brands

Act now

Learn more




Conditions of use

When you contribute content to our site, you retain ownership of the copyright. You also grant permission to Oxfam Australia to display and distribute your content, and to use it for any promotional purpose, without remuneration, compensation, or payment of royalties.

In addition, you are responsible for the content of your material. Oxfam Australia takes no responsibility for the content of any messages or information posted by contributors.

Oxfam Australia retains the right, in our sole discretion, to review, edit or delete any material which we deem to be illegal, offensive or otherwise inappropriate.

 

Step to it!

Join the Sneaky Business march to support footwear workers' rights.

Join our campaign

Keep track of what brands are doing and find out the latest labour rights news. Subscribe to NikeWatch News.

  1. Privacy Policy

Adidas workers blog

RSS icon.

Latest updates